Encryption is only a danger if you have no values. If you value something, like a farm in Massachussets where your family lives, and some sheep and you like you

Encryption is only a danger if you have no values. If you value something, like a farm in Massachussets where your family lives, and some sheep and you like your PSVR, then you have reasons to like encryption. Encryption is defense. It can protect the things you love. If you are a purely political agent, with no values, just an ideology you are trying to impose on the world, then encryption might be a problem. To you, the world is just power struggles. You like this person, you don't like this other person. You want this to happen, you don't want that to happen. Control is good when you wield it, and bad when someone else does. It's no way to live. That's a prehistoric approach to existence. There are infinite universes, so there is a universe for everyone. The faster we get to the point where everyone has a universe that they are protecting, one which can sustain their body, the sooner we can see these technologies for what they are: safety. Armies and nations and crypto breaking should be needed sparingly. We need to get to a world where they're needed sparingly.