2 ms·
The problem with Flash et al is how they were proprietary browser plugins. I do not believe anyone is trying to pursue QML web integration as a plugin, especial
by zanny 9y ago
The problem with Flash et al is how they were proprietary browser plugins. I do not believe anyone is trying to pursue QML web integration as a plugin, especially since plugins are going away all together in every major browser. I'm not sure if you could webassembly a working environment, but having to redirect users to install an addon is a huge UX failure.
The goal would be strictly to get .qml supported as a render target the same way .html (and in many browsers, .mp4 / .png / .svg / .json etc) is today.
- recursive 9y agoWhat browser has json rendering?
- zanny 9y agoFirefox does. Go open something with content-type json ex: https://accounts.google.com/.well-known/openid-configuration https://accounts.google.com/.well-known/openid-configuration in Firefox and it renders it into a pretty table and even shows you the headers on the response.