Isn't that monopolistic behaviour? I suspect that it might violate some laws, though I don't know anything in particular. On the other hand, why couldn't DDG ju

Isn't that monopolistic behaviour? I suspect that it might violate some laws, though I don't know anything in particular. On the other hand, why couldn't DDG just do what Google does and say "robots.txt prevents us from getting a description for this site"? On one hand I'm against the cartel beahviour of Google doing something like that, but on the other hand, if Google asks and the other company agrees to block DDG, why shouldn't that be allowed?