4 ms·
> But anyway, their excuse that it needs to be secret is BS, DDOS protection methods are widespread and not very secret as it is. They probably just want to kee
by featherverse 9y ago
> But anyway, their excuse that it needs to be secret is BS, DDOS protection methods are widespread and not very secret as it is. They probably just want to keep it secret, because they don't actually have proper DDOS protection.
This.
At what point did the government become a special interest group which does not exist to protect the nation it serves? Providing good security advice is their job.
Even if they do have some super secret techniques, keeping them secret is not a strategy, it's what idiots who don't know anything about technology or computers or network security would do.
I would trust Cloudflare's staff over the FCC's I.T. department every day of the week, and I hate Cloudflare.
- lilott8 9y agoNot only that, in what way does an independent agency having zero ties to national security or the IC have any right to hold just about* anything secret? This is asinine!
- arca_vorago 9y agoI think you underestimate just how far we've allowed natsec expansion to taint even the most benign agencies. As a constitutionalist, the real problem as I have condensed it is that the balance between providing for the common defense has completely overshadowed things like securing the blessings of liberty. Our gov is increasingly leaning authoritarian, and the populace has allowed it.
- lilott8 9y agoI wouldn't say I've underestimated anything. That was an honest question; as in: "what mental gymnastics did the FCC do to even think that keeping secrets is allowable?" That aside, I would agree with you.
- arca_vorago 9y agoAh, a small miscommunication I guess. My guess is the decision to keep secrets was made and then someone was told to do the gymnastics.