2 ms·
If unions are "tyranny of the masses", isn't no unions "tyranny of the dictators"? It's not an either/or situation. As pointed out elsewhere, the relationship b
by lutorm 9y ago
If unions are "tyranny of the masses", isn't no unions "tyranny of the dictators"? It's not an either/or situation. As pointed out elsewhere, the relationship between unions and employers in the United States seems particularly poisoned, but there are many European countries where unions and employers have a much more productive relationship.
Of course, it probably does require the company to route some of the products of their labor back to the workers, which I guess is what American companies are loath to do?