3 ms·
Ha! A few gb ram and a few tb disk is real cheap in the cloud. If your dataset fits in ram, and when it doesn't you have to buy more boxes with more ram rather
by willvarfar 9y ago
Ha! A few gb ram and a few tb disk is real cheap in the cloud.
If your dataset fits in ram, and when it doesn't you have to buy more boxes with more ram rather than just buying more disk, then I think you are making a very uneconomical trade off.
- fweespeech 9y ago> Ha! A few gb ram and a few tb disk is real cheap in the cloud. > If your dataset fits in ram, and when it doesn't you have to buy more boxes with more ram rather than just buying more disk, then I think you are making a very uneconomical trade off. It is all in what lower latency is worth to the bottom line and how well you scale horizontally.
- willvarfar 9y agoMy link described performance too. A cluster of innodb boxes is going to be slower than a single tokudb box. (Src: have run each, and stuff like shard-query to parallelise queries and scale them out)