5 ms·
That is an interesting fact.. LinkedIn broke the ruling against scraping they are relying on to prevent scraping.
by eadz 9y ago
That is an interesting fact.. LinkedIn broke the ruling against scraping they are relying on to prevent scraping.
- throwaway91111 9y agoScraping would be forbidden via TOS; theoretically it would be the users giving access to linked in (who actually is bound by the terms) who would be liable, not linked in.
- pmiller2 9y agoThat still wouldn't prevent an entity (person or corporation) that never agreed to the TOS from scraping.
- bb611 9y agoIf it's illegal to scrape without permission, that makes the behavior of scraping illegal. They are not claiming it's a TOS violation, they're claiming it's a CFAA violation, which is a federal statue and (theoretically) applies equally to everyone.
- throwaway91111 9y agoMy point is that someone with permission gave them access.
- bb611 9y agoHaving "permission" is not an applicable defense to a federal criminal charge, the law supersedes some random person (i.e. a LinkedIn user) saying "oh yeah, that's okay."