3 ms·
One thing that I wondered about when looking at the longest recorded professional games that occurred in real play was at what point they reached a position tha
by schoen 9y ago
One thing that I wondered about when looking at the longest recorded professional games that occurred in real play was at what point they reached a position that is actually solved in a tablebase. In particular, chess endgames involving only 7 pieces were explicitly solved by computer search in 2012. (But I also wonder if bringing those solutions to bear in a real game would involve ignoring the 50-move rule, since tablebase solution for these positions may often require more than 50 moves to complete.)
On tablebase-informed endgame theory, some of the professionals in these ultra-long games should probably have resigned long before the actual end of the games, except that they can also assume that their opponents don't know the full solutions.
- Someone 9y agoProfessionals may try to get a draw by getting their opponent to make an error under time pressure, even if they know their position theoretically is a lost one. That even happened back in the time when games got adjourned after x moves (sort of an example: https://www.chess.com/blog/NimzoRoy/a-famous-bishop-vs-knight-ending-or-smyslov-blows-botvinnik-off-the-board3 https://www.chess.com/blog/NimzoRoy/a-famous-bishop-vs-knigh...), so should be more popular nowadays, if the losing party has more time on the clock, or thinks to know the particular endgame better.