4 ms·
That is a good start but isn't sufficient. Many browsers exist on networks that are airgapped or are off of the Internet for extended periods of time. Plus, t
by IncRnd 9y ago
That is a good start but isn't sufficient. Many browsers exist on networks that are airgapped or are off of the Internet for extended periods of time. Plus, there are regulations or policies in many places that forbid this type of action.
- logicallee 9y agoAre we talking about the same thing? Chrome? Chrome literally auto-updates.
- IncRnd 9y agoMy point is that Chrome cannot always auto-update for all installations. From that standpoint I made the comment that an Internet based revocation code may not be sufficient, and disclosures/notifications will still need to be monitored by administrators.
- logicallee 9y agoorgs running such ridiculous setups can monitor revokes coming over the wire from google and selectively apply them themselves, if they just care about their busy-work jobs sitting reading security bulletins. I don't really care about the security of their made-up non-jobs and google shouldn't either. they can do what they like.