4 ms·
That crossed my mind, but it'd mean they'd be willing to lock out large networks behind a NAT. I was wondering if there's something more sophisticated available
by TomSawyer 9y ago
That crossed my mind, but it'd mean they'd be willing to lock out large networks behind a NAT. I was wondering if there's something more sophisticated available.
- dylz 9y ago100% they are willing to lock out NAT networks, have been subject to this more than once browsing normally.
- JoblessWonder 9y agoAlso, they are just locking out users that aren't signed in. If a user has a login, they are probably much more likely to err on the side of caution before locking down access in some way.