> if the in-groups private messaging is in line with their publicly stated positions then what's there to leak? 1. We won't know unless there is a leak 2. I t

> if the in-groups private messaging is in line with their publicly stated positions then what's there to leak? 1. We won't know unless there is a leak 2. I think the fact that there was a leak was as or more damaging to Clinton than the actual leak itself. Anecdotal... My dad: "but the emails!" Me: "what about them?" Dad: "They were hacked". Me: "what did they say?" Dad: "..." 3. So you're saying, yes there is a clear bias?