3 ms·

Are you sure latency stayed around 100ns? http://pics.crucial.com/wcsstore/CrucialSAS/images/campaigns/c3-speed-vs-latency-table.png http://pics.crucial.com/wc

• vvanders 9y ago
  Probably not but I think the point stands that latency hasn't made any major strides since the switch from SDR to DDR.
• deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]
• nikhilgarg28 9y ago
  That's very interesting. The estimate of 100ns came from here: https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~rcs/research/interactive_l.. https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~rcs/research/interactive_l.... and is probably not very precise (maybe because it is only capturing rough order of magnitude). I have now updated the post. Thanks for the feedback! Specific constant aside, the point about latency not improving much still holds.
  • nayuki 9y ago
    Your link got truncated with ellipses. Here we go: http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~rcs/research/interactive_latency.html http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~rcs/research/interactive_laten...
• everheardofc 9y ago
  There are these things called speed of light and virtual memory. The latency of the physical RAM is completely irrelevant unless its embedded directly on the cpu