2 ms·
> You're moving the goalposts. At first you said it's not on those large websites at all No. taneq said that. I'm not taneq. In fact taneq said that in respons
by true_religion 9y ago
> You're moving the goalposts. At first you said it's not on those large websites at all
No. taneq said that. I'm not taneq. In fact taneq said that in response to me asking someone else a question.
I said "Niche sites generally don't find themselves on pornhub because .... ".
I think I equivocated quite a bit there to the point that my goal posts can be mounted on roller blades without changing the nature of the game. :)
> Do you seriously think that this amount of free content is not enough for a lot of people?
No.
Source: The company I work for sells this exact same content to a lot of people.
At least in my head, proprietary data and work experience is going to trump Google video searches and rhetoric.
- int_19h 9y agoMy apologies for identity confusion I know that there are companies that sell this type of content to a lot of people. This doesn't contradict the statement that the majority of people who are looking for that type content, can find what they want for free. It still leaves plenty of people to sell paid content to. Based on the amount of content I can see even from cursory looks, this seems likely. Now, if you have access specifically to market research data that contradicts that - then I stand corrected.