3 ms·
I can't get into details, but I worked at a place that was thinking about opening up some development for open source publishing. Another team was working on so
by bane 9y ago
I can't get into details, but I worked at a place that was thinking about opening up some development for open source publishing. Another team was working on some very high-end algorithmic work in a specialized field and the company was pumping lots of money into internal R&D for that group. They were selected as an open source test case.
They pushed up their code to github and within a few months a group of them had left the company to form a boot-strapped competitor using their same code -- essentially using the open source publication of their tools as a way to legally ex-filtrate corporate IP -- a nightmare scenario for many companies (and also recently in the news i.e. Uber v Waymo).
This one act burned all open source publishing plans to the ground and now that company open sources as little software as possible. Now, several years later, they haven't published a single line of open source code that I'm aware of.
- cannam 9y agoOne reason why a GPL licence can be a good idea for businesses -- and BSD/MIT a good idea for employees.
- noobermin 9y agoBut GPL is bad mmkay, Apple told me so. Seriously, I'm not surprised people haven't thought to take advantage of this aspect of GPL for their own selfish benefit. It's only when you're someone like Apple where BSD or MIT or any of the "permissive" licenses make sense for you, that or you really want to be self-less.
- sumedh 9y ago> They were selected as an open source test case. What exactly did the company expect would happen when you open source some high end algorithmic work which needed lot of money in R&D.
- pmarreck 9y agoIsn't this really a cautionary tale of bad licensing and not open-sourcing? https://choosealicense.com/ https://choosealicense.com/