> You're argument is basically, we can't trust either, so we should just throw our hands up and ignore them all? No. I didn't even suggest some immediate actio

> You're argument is basically, we can't trust either, so we should just throw our hands up and ignore them all? No. I didn't even suggest some immediate action for the current situation. There is probably no way to fix it. The scientific method cannot solve everything. Maybe it can prove global warming. But the human factor can still corrupt any facts established. That is why I said we need strong ethics. We need to accept the truth, even if it is inconvenient.