3 ms·
It can at most be about the facts of the article as understood by the writer (Murray Gell-Man applies here), which the commenter may very well know better than
by tomjen3 9y ago
It can at most be about the facts of the article as understood by the writer (Murray Gell-Man applies here), which the commenter may very well know better than the writer.
- kurthr 9y agoAs long as they are facts stated in the article (and the article has been read), I don't see an issue. However, a good NLP might still make automated spam posting possible.