Sure they could, but it's not the definition of speech that needs to be fixed, it's the definition of "dishonesty campaign." And there, the problem is not abou

Sure they could, but it's not the definition of speech that needs to be fixed, it's the definition of "dishonesty campaign." And there, the problem is not about speech, but identity-protection for the religious. One person's lies are "protected tradition" while another person's lies are "dangerous fake news."