3 ms·
I agree but I can't help see the parallel to "these things are not what is AI. It started with, "surely, if the computer can beat a human in chess, that must m
by jacobush 9y ago
I agree but I can't help see the parallel to "these things are not what is AI.
It started with, "surely, if the computer can beat a human in chess, that must mean it's intelligent". Then went from there.