4 ms·
It's just you. PHP.net documentation was always better than the rest, easy to read, some simple examples and with helpful comments. JavaDoc, MSDN had no comment
by frik 9y ago
It's just you. PHP.net documentation was always better than the rest, easy to read, some simple examples and with helpful comments. JavaDoc, MSDN had no comments for decades, little examples and the later one lacked lots of API parts. Show me one online documentation of a language that is/was better. Also great are the book "Programming in C 2nd ed" and "Programming Lua", and the Golang focus isn't bad.
PHP.net 2017 explode function: http://php.net/manual/en/function.explode.php http://php.net/manual/en/function.explode.php
PHP.net 2005 explode function: https://web.archive.org/web/20050206214005/http://php.net/manual/en/function.explode.php https://web.archive.org/web/20050206214005/http://php.net/ma...
- k__ 9y agoI'm not saying the otheres were better. I 'm just saying that PHP.net docs simply had false claims and they needed the users to comment and make them right. I don't wanna know how much hours I lost with that, haha. Well these days I simply look in the source, because it doesn't lie
- lawpoop 9y agoWhat were the false claims?
- batat 9y agoSome awful stuff: http://php.net/manual/en/function.escapeshellarg.php http://php.net/manual/en/function.escapeshellarg.php http://php.net/manual/en/numberformatter.setpattern.php http://php.net/manual/en/numberformatter.setpattern.php