4 ms·

I'm not saying we shouldn't practice defense in depth where it's possible. It's just that I don't think preventing this style of attack is actually the most re

I'm not saying we shouldn't practice defense in depth where it's possible. It's just that I don't think preventing this style of attack is actually the most relevant/impactful application of this style of research. Again, I'm not saying this research is irrelevant. I'm saying it's way more relevant than this particular example implies. > would be less detectable compared with a whole missing sign. This kind of assumes that the attack wouldn't work in the first place, no? If cars are crashing people are going to investigate to figure out why, and even the most thick-skulled beat cop can figure out that stop signs with rando weird ass stickers on them are probably worth running up the chain...

cscurmudgeon 9y ago
> This kind of assumes that the attack wouldn't work in the first place, no? If cars are crashing people are going to investigate to figure out why, and even the most thick-skulled beat cop can figure out that stop signs with rando weird ass stickers on them are probably worth running up the chain... 1. That attack may not target only self-driving cars. 2. Imagine someone driving around with some random picture on their car at the back. Except that the picture is an attack.