3 ms·
> (Well, in case of these two, better to check that person has some grasp of static typing :)) http://www.erlang.org/doc/reference_manual/typespec.html http://
by mononcqc 16y ago
> (Well, in case of these two, better to check that person has some grasp of static typing :))
http://www.erlang.org/doc/reference_manual/typespec.html http://www.erlang.org/doc/reference_manual/typespec.html
http://web.mit.edu/drscheme_v42/.share.sun4x_510/plt/doc/ts-reference/index.html http://web.mit.edu/drscheme_v42/.share.sun4x_510/plt/doc/ts-...
Shouldn't be that hard. It's not because the language is dynamic that it doesn't support static types ;)
- chc 16y agoThe fact that there are extensions to those languages to add static typing still doesn't establish much of a correlation between "knows this language" and "groks static typing." There are lots of very proficient Schemers who have never used Typed Racket.
- mononcqc 16y agoYes, my comment wasn't meant to be totally serious. If static typing extensions were really used by everyone using Racket and/or Erlang, I wouldn't even have had to link to the extensions to begin with :)
- kunjaan 16y agoUpdate: It's Typed Racket which is available here - http://docs.racket-lang.org/ts-reference/index.html http://docs.racket-lang.org/ts-reference/index.html