3 ms·
The cool thing about this kind of filter is that it specifically has nothing to do with what the potential poster is about to post. As long as the questions rem
by pharrington 9y ago
The cool thing about this kind of filter is that it specifically has nothing to do with what the potential poster is about to post. As long as the questions remain about the facts in the article, intuitively it seems terrible for virality (as it extends the time frame between casual emotion and action), so I doubt any large news outlet would actually implement this.
- tomjen3 9y agoIt can at most be about the facts of the article as understood by the writer (Murray Gell-Man applies here), which the commenter may very well know better than the writer.
- kurthr 9y agoAs long as they are facts stated in the article (and the article has been read), I don't see an issue. However, a good NLP might still make automated spam posting possible.