3 ms·
I don't think this is a true dichotomy. 1) "call it speech and you can now do it unrestricted" I agree, that would be silly; the perpetrator could choose to c
by jpttsn 9y ago
I don't think this is a true dichotomy.
1) "call it speech and you can now do it unrestricted"
I agree, that would be silly; the perpetrator could choose to call any action speech.
2) campaigns of dishonesty
Could these campaigns be carried out by actions that fall under a commonly before hand agreed on definition of speech?
- Retra 9y agoSure they could, but it's not the definition of speech that needs to be fixed, it's the definition of "dishonesty campaign." And there, the problem is not about speech, but identity-protection for the religious. One person's lies are "protected tradition" while another person's lies are "dangerous fake news."