No need to involve other nations: the US military is moving ahead on its own: http://www.insidesources.com/nsa-chief-without-ai-cyber-is-a-losing-strategy/ htt

No need to involve other nations: the US military is moving ahead on its own: http://www.insidesources.com/nsa-chief-without-ai-cyber-is-a-losing-strategy/ http://www.insidesources.com/nsa-chief-without-ai-cyber-is-a... From the 2016 article: "Artificial intelligence will play a big role in the future of U.S. strategy in cyberspace, according to National Security Agency Director Adm. Michael Rogers, who told Congress Tuesday that relying primarily on human intelligence 'is a losing strategy.'” The lineage of military intelligence systems using AI is (necessarily, historically) heavily biased toward language-based AGI ("old AI") rather than neural networks. The NN are there of course, but IMO the impressive work is in the AGI.