3 ms·
The UK has been a leader in developing internet censorship for over 20 years; it's never been just one party or government. When certain big network equipment
by kps 9y ago
The UK has been a leader in developing internet censorship for over 20 years; it's never been just one party or government.
When certain big network equipment companies (this was before Huawei cloned everything) responded to criticism for building the Great Firewall of China by saying they were only supplying off-the-shelf gear already in use in the West, they weren't lying.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- DaiPlusPlus 9y agoOnly the past 10, maybe 15 years - the worst damage has all been in the past 5 years - but you're right about it being both parties: under Labour we had RIPA and the wet-dreams of "Wacky Jacqui" Smith - which in turn enabled the the Tory gov's implementation of these regressive legislation. The problem is how the UK cabinet is arranged and the politically powerful role of Home Secretary - where the job description is a license to dream up, campaign for, and implement the most effective means of "keeping the country safe". Quite unfortunate. Long-term change would only be effected by having the role's description framed in the context of keeping the UK - and its freedoms - safe. It's a subtle change to the oath of office, but would hopefully prevent the recent abuses we've seen. Universal mass surveillance is fundamentally incompatible with our right to privacy.
- kps 9y agoNo, more than 20. Sometimes, the slope actually is slippery. http://www.liquisearch.com/internet_watch_foundation/history/background http://www.liquisearch.com/internet_watch_foundation/history...