4 ms·
You are misunderstanding the point of WSL. It's not about writing software with Linux that users will run with Windows. Rather, it's about writing software on W
by hossbeast 9y ago
You are misunderstanding the point of WSL. It's not about writing software with Linux that users will run with Windows. Rather, it's about writing software on Windows that users will run on Linux.
The target demographic is developers of Linux server software. A lot of those devs today run macOS
- vvanders 9y agoOh no, I get that. The OP was making the assertion that open source doesn't need win32 portability. That's a huge pain in the ass for those of us who work in things that are tied to win32(graphics, gamedev tools, etc) we happily contribute back but ripping out a working port just seems petty.
- blibble 9y agoit's a maintenance cost I have to maintain a separate build system for Windows, all the win32 specific code, and also test under Windows... and most of this requires a Windows license if I can rip all of that out by outsourcing the compatibility testing to Microsoft: all the better, even if I have to add a line to the documentation requiring users to check a checkbox once in some control panel somewhere
- Spivak 9y agoOnce you turn WSL would the actual user experience of those apps change? Shouldn't you be happy that WSL will enable F/OSS devs to write cross-platform software much easier by not having to keep two sets of code?