3 ms·
I think we should recognize that SF and Brisbane are not in the same league. Anything Brisbane would build would be a drop in the bucket. SF can potentially a
by pizzetta 9y ago
I think we should recognize that SF and Brisbane are not in the same league. Anything Brisbane would build would be a drop in the bucket. SF can potentially add a hundred thousand units --two hundred thousand units, no problem without changing the character from village to full-blown city. 4,00 units more than doubles the pop of Brisbane. If we added 200,000 units to _only_ SF, that would add 25% to their pop. Another 200,000 would add 20% to SJ.
The Problem is SF, Oakland and SJ --localities which can/could build if they wanted to but simply don't.
- wbl 9y agoIt also increases the built area of Brisbane.
- closeparen 9y agoOakland seems to be approving residential towers at a decent clip. I'm not sure it belongs in the same breath as SF and SJ.