> Stop gaming peer review by having the papers reviewed by a group of people who all agree. https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ https://climate.nas

> Stop gaming peer review by having the papers reviewed by a group of people who all agree. https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ > Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources. When you have 97% agreement on a subject its difficult to guarantee the 3% is represented in every peer review. That isn't "gaming" the system. That is just the reality of how Science works across the board. You aren't going to magically find a small, vocal minority has the bandwidth and numbers to be represented 50% of the time like you find in politics.