No, the problem is the sentence. Will you say that peer review papers about quantum mechanics are rigged because they are reviewed by a group of people who all

No, the problem is the sentence. Will you say that peer review papers about quantum mechanics are rigged because they are reviewed by a group of people who all agree that eveolution is real? Will you say that peer review papers about Evolution are rigged because they are reviewed by a group of people who all agree that eveolution is real? > The academic peer review process is far from perfect, and the incentives of the humans involved does not necessarily align with producing the most accurate science And this is another subtle accusation of fraud. Do you have any proof of climate science papers are rigged? > This is certainly a discussion that needs to be had, and responding in this way which is dismissive is exactly what the parent was saying No, the parent was saying that climate papers are wrong beacuse the papers are only reviewed by people that think that climate change is real.