> This is a textbook example of the lazy, uneducated thinking that causes fear and outrage. I'm highly educated despite what you may think. >Lazy lazy lazy fa

> This is a textbook example of the lazy, uneducated thinking that causes fear and outrage. I'm highly educated despite what you may think. >Lazy lazy lazy false equivalence. I have a degree in philosophy and I think you need a refresher course on logic. > To say that "they're all the same" is absolutely not the case and nor will it ever be. I didn't say they were the "same". Saying an apple and a banana are fruits doesn't mean that I'm saying an apple is a banana. Just because I say foxnews and the nytimes are propagandists doesn't mean I'm saying foxnews = nytimes. > The sooner people become more discerning of the information that they consume, the better off we all will be. Agreed. Hopefully, you'll join us one day in being a more discerning about information. > There is an extremely large gulf in the baseline quality of reporting between those two outlets. Agreed. NYTimes is far better quality propaganda. They have a lot more influence and credibility. But the NYTimes is still propaganda. > If you cannot discern that, then you are too far gone. One of us seem to gone for sure.