So... You want to mollify her point by saying, "Not all tech?" I'm just confused, because this seems like such an obvious statement. Of course not every workpl

So... You want to mollify her point by saying, "Not all tech?" I'm just confused, because this seems like such an obvious statement. Of course not every workplace is this bad. Why does that have to be said here? The author seems to convey a frustration with what she feels is an industy-level problem. Given the events of the last 5 years and the general statistics for women in tech, maybe that's not unreasonable. Both your point and hers can coexist in the same narrative. It's just that your point seems a bit like you're mad the article wasn't copy-edited to avoid pedantic objections about implicit quantification.