3 ms·
(a) Why was the one offer rejected? (b) Might more offers have been made if the Jones act didn't exist? (c) Isn't it true that the fifteen foreign-flagged ves
by hugh3 16y ago
(a) Why was the one offer rejected?
(b) Might more offers have been made if the Jones act didn't exist?
(c) Isn't it true that the fifteen foreign-flagged vessels working have nonetheless had to have their experienced foreign crews replaced with Americans due to the demands of the Jones Act? Also, don't they have to stay at least three miles offshore at all times?
- Anechoic 16y agoMight more offers have been made if the Jones act didn't exist? From the linked article: "In reality, the Jones Act has yet to be an issue in the response efforts. The Deepwater Horizon response team reported in a June 15 press release that there are 15 foreign flagged ships currently participating in the oil spill cleanup. None of them needed a waiver because the Jones Act does not apply. The Jones Act is a trade and commerce law that was enacted in 1920 as part of a larger Marine Merchant Act. It requires all trade delivered between U.S. ports to be carried in U.S. flagged vessels constructed in the United States and owned by American citizens. The law states its purpose is to develop a merchant marine for national defense and commerce." and "To date, 25 countries and four international organizations have offered support in the form of skimming vessels, containment and fire boom, technical assistance and response solutions, among others."
- jonathanwallace 16y agoFind the answers to (a) here. http://factcheck.org/2010/06/oil-spill-foreign-help-and-the-jones-act/ http://factcheck.org/2010/06/oil-spill-foreign-help-and-the-... I'd appreciate it if you could substantiate your allegations in (c) with a reference. Thanks.