3 ms·
>which, as cheap as genome sequencing has become, does not seem likely to ever happen unless non-chemical-based processes are developed It seems pretty much in
by new299 9y ago
>which, as cheap as genome sequencing has become, does not seem likely to ever happen unless non-chemical-based processes are developed
It seems pretty much inevitable that genome sequencing will use non-chemical (non sequencing-by-synthesis) methods in the future (I've worked for two companies that have developed such techniques with varying degrees of success). In the far-ish future I think we'll see a human genome for 1 to 10USD with a turn-around time of maybe 10 to 20mins. That seems pretty achievable using a solid-state nanopore approach.
I think even novel labeled/SBS approaches might be able to do interesting things here.