4 ms·
why can't have both, "eliminating things that drag it down" + genetic engineering?
by dis-sys 9y ago
why can't have both, "eliminating things that drag it down" + genetic engineering?
- SideburnsOfDoom 9y agoYou can have the first if you have a government with sufficient sense and compassion, it's been that way for a long time - and to be fair a lot of issues have been reduced or eliminated over the decades. e.g. Leaded vehicle fuel is a thing of the past. You can have the second at some time in the future if the research works out and you can afford it.
- spamizbad 9y agoIf we're going to act like we're a bunch of smarty-pants engineers here, it seems rational to start with the low hanging fruit: environmental toxins. In addition to facing fewer ethical pitfalls, greatly reducing these environmental factors is well within our current means. It also universally beneficial, and not limited to those who can afford "Boutique" offspring.