3 ms·

It's not true. They're both bad, but football has higher rates of concussion. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2140075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

• heyheyhey 9y ago
  It's a start but USSoccer limits heading up to age 13:http://www.ussoccer.com/about/recognize-to-recover/concussion-guidelines http://www.ussoccer.com/about/recognize-to-recover/concussio... "Eliminating heading for children 10 and under Limiting the amount of heading in practice for children between the ages of 11 and 13"
  • heygrady 9y ago
    This is an easy step that soccer has taken to reduce the occurrences of brain injuries. Anyone who is confused on this issue should note that any jostling of the brain can cause minor, short-term brain damage. It's bad enough to bounce a relatively soft soccer ball off your head to warrant removing the practice from the sport, especially for younger players. Other sports, like football, present a much harder challenge. Even if you remove direct head contact as a variable, most aspects of tackling can result in concussions. The reason football is uniquely controversial is that minor concussions are mostly inevitable and severe concussions are commonplace. By contrast, the most likely way to get a concussion in soccer is to head the ball, which isn't fundamental to gameplay. In any sport, you might run into another player at high speed but that's not typically a core part of the gameplay. Football is controversial because it's hard to fix.
• learc83 9y ago
  In addition to concussions, football players are also believed to receive repeated microtrauma from running into each other repeatedly.