3 ms·
Erm, no offense but: a) physics programs are supposed to offer interactivity. Else whats the point? b) the physics look unearthly
by laythea 9y ago
Erm, no offense but:
a) physics programs are supposed to offer interactivity. Else whats the point?
b) the physics look unearthly
- santaclaus 9y ago> physics programs are supposed to offer interactivity. Else whats the point? To solve differential equations for which analytical solutions do not exist? Edit: Differential inclusions, if inequality constraints are included in the system (as they would here).
- laythea 9y agoOf course it depends on what the goal of the program is, but something like this should offer user interactivity. By solving whatever is necessary (or faking it).
- xchip 9y agoa) I know, that is still WIP :) b) There is no friction, and as Newton's First Law states "an object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by an external force" :)
- laythea 9y agoHey, again no offense meant. I just think the whole point of something like this is to mimic the real world. And after a couple of seconds my illusion is broken. Ps. It is cool, just needs to be cooler :)
- hellofunk 9y agoThe link is for interactive demos.