3 ms·
"The BGI Cognitive Genomics Project is currently doing whole-genome sequencing of 1,000 very-high-IQ people around the world, hunting for sets of sets of IQ-pre
by pcnonpc 9y ago
"The BGI Cognitive Genomics Project is currently doing whole-genome sequencing of 1,000 very-high-IQ people around the world, hunting for sets of sets of IQ-predicting alleles. I know because I recently contributed my DNA to the project, not fully understanding the implications. These IQ gene-sets will be found eventually—but will probably be used mostly in China, for China. Potentially, the results would allow all Chinese couples to maximize the intelligence of their offspring by selecting among their own fertilized eggs for the one or two that include the highest likelihood of the highest intelligence. Given the Mendelian genetic lottery, the kids produced by any one couple typically differ by 5 to 15 IQ points. So this method of "preimplantation embryo selection" might allow IQ within every Chinese family to increase by 5 to 15 IQ points per generation. After a couple of generations, it would be game over for Western global competitiveness."
https://www.edge.org/response-detail/23838 https://www.edge.org/response-detail/23838
What do you think about this? From what I gather, the Chinese and much of East Asia do not have cultural resistance against using genetic engineering to increase their children's IQs. I will even guess that the governments will encourage their populations to use it.
Will the US, in particular the educated portion of the population, will adopt the practice soon after it is proven safe?
If China starts to do that en masse, Europe and the US will likely criticize them initially. Will they then be forced to adopt the practice soon afterwards? If so, how many years of lag approximately? How much resistance will there be on adopting the practice especially considering the left's belief on everyone's fundamental equality?
The denial about the importance of intelligence is quite obvious now at least by a significant percentage of Americans and Europeans. (They claim "hard work and culture are what matter.", ignoring twins and adopt studies) Will they wait for 1-2 generations until it's so obvious they cannot compete when they start to use genetic engineering themselves?
- pcnonpc 9y agoThe average Chinese also values education and intellgence much more than the average American. "Beijing parents splurge £154,000 on street alleyway in catchment area for desirable school It may be a dusty passageway, ridden with insects and with electric cables dangling precariously from crumbling concrete overhead, but its value outstrips top-end property in Kensington and Chelsea due to rising demand from Chinese parents battling to get their children into elite schools." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/23/beijing-parents-splurge-154000-on-street-alleyway-in-catchment-a/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/23/beijing-parents-s...
- HillaryBriss 9y agoin today's economic environment, intelligence is a desirable trait. but, are there other imaginable economic environments in which intelligence becomes unimportant? i'm reminded of the saying "China has two words for foreigner: barbarian and master" China's legendary, long standing emphasis on education and intelligence has served it well for much of its history, but perhaps not all of it.