> If I want my program used for things I agree with only I should have that right. If OSI says my license isn't good, then I'll be proud to have a non-conformin

> If I want my program used for things I agree with only I should have that right. If OSI says my license isn't good, then I'll be proud to have a non-conforming license. The OP talked of "open sourcing". This implies that his software will satisfy freedom 0 - which is not possible with a military use restriction. EDIT: If he just meant "releasing the source code" he would surely have used this wording.