5 ms·

You can't discriminate against any fields of endeavor[0] if you wish for your software to be under any OSI approved open source license. [0] https://opensource

by Kostic 9y ago

You can't discriminate against any fields of endeavor[0] if you wish for your software to be under any OSI approved open source license. [0] https://opensource.org/osd-annotated https://opensource.org/osd-annotated

vortico 9y ago
[deleted]
- deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]
- 4ad 9y ago
  Actually, he did.
  - Boothroid 9y ago
    He said he would be 'open sourcing' it. To me this means, making the source available. I suspect OP doesn't care about strict definitions of what does and doesn't constitute open source..
    - wolfgke 9y ago
      > To me this means, making the source available. "Shared source" is a notion which Microsoft termed to refer to make the source code available without the software being open source. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_source
ivcha 9y ago
he/she actually can, if he/she chooses to... some licenses discriminate against people that don't have money for buying them, so there should be nothing unfair about this...