4 ms·
I can't which one is the best. But we use MailGun and we are not happy with it. We will probably switch to Postmark.
by boyanpro 9y ago
I can't which one is the best. But we use MailGun and we are not happy with it. We will probably switch to Postmark.
- bdibs 9y agoWhy aren’t you happy with MailGun? I’m a customer and I haven’t had any issues with it.
- newsbinator 9y agoMailGun's support is horrible. I kept emailing them to let them know about login issues, and it would take them a week to get back to me. After a couple tries, they just dropped the ball and stopped following up on the ticket. Message received.
- kc10 9y agoI also never faced an issue with MailGun, though I mostly use smtp not their http api. Is there any specific issue you ran into?
- akhatri_aus 9y agoFor us it takes too long for the messages to be received with mailgun.
- davewasthere 9y agoYou're noticing a delay between mailgun getting the email and it getting to the client? I'm using their REST api to send emails, and I've yet to see an email take more than a couple of seconds to get to destination (gmail) while testing. How long is too long?
- dgranda 9y agoI use both on free tier and I am happier with PostMark. I had several issues when sending to Microsoft (hotmail, msn, etc.) domains via MailGun because someone exceeded granted quota for outbound IP address and since then I balance outgoing emails using both. As mentioned by others, MailGun support doesn't care much about queries from free tier users so I would go for PostMark if I had to pay (more intensive use) or recommend to someone.