>It's a comstruction of a pure subset variant of Lisp. We viewed it as the core of LISP and this is just one view of LISP. >The actual LISP wasn't pure. Not b

>It's a comstruction of a pure subset variant of Lisp. We viewed it as the core of LISP and this is just one view of LISP. >The actual LISP wasn't pure. Not before this particular paper and not after. LISP I is not pure and I agree.