I'm not sure this argument is any more plausible than the "evil genius" argument from Descartes. I think that all it's saying is that given our limited referen

I'm not sure this argument is any more plausible than the "evil genius" argument from Descartes. I think that all it's saying is that given our limited reference frame within the universe, we can't judge what is "normal" and what is not. And that's basically a definitional observation.