3 ms·
Your response exactly proves my point and show that you are not really trying to understand the author’s perspective. > “Street vernacular aside, my guess is t
by mugenjin 9y ago
Your response exactly proves my point and show that you are not really trying to understand the author’s perspective.
> “Street vernacular aside, my guess is the article would have been better received if the author weren't "one of the world’s greatest software developers" who "paid a substantial price to achieve my high level of greatness".
I agree. It’s damn obvious that he’s not the best programmer in the world. But man, he made it out of a poverty-stricken environment. Don’t you think he’s allow to brag? I think so. Him being arrogant still doesn’t mean you should disregards his perspective.
> It's that extreme arrogance coupled with calling all these coworkers bitches and hos that makes me "uncomfortable”.”
Calling people bitches and hoes is definitely part of street vernacular in a poor black community. He had to adapt. I’m sure if he used proper english, he’d probably be called out for trying to be white. It’s one of the vicious cycle that most black communities are trying to combat within their own communities. So yeah, he’s gonna call people bitches and hoes.
> “Also being broadly racist against white people isn't strengthening the message.”
Again, you refuse to understand his perspective. He’s black. He grew up in a poor black community and based on history, white communities haven’t really been nice to them. So yeah, dealing with “white” is a big social issue for him. He tells you this at the beginning of his post.
All I’m saying is why is everyone disregarding this guy’s perspective just because he used street vernacular that’s consistent with his upbringing and character? Why is his perspective less than any one else? Sure he called some people bitches and hoes. Sure he has an ego almost as big as Kanye. It still doesn’t discredit his point.
I mean, have you never experience what he pointed out about ‘uncomfortable’? I have definitely experience what he’s saying. I have even used the same excuse as well in the past. I’ve seen colleagues use the same excuse. He’s not wrong.
It’s just fucking disappointing that everyone here is so privilege that they can’t even conceive his perspective.
- ominous 9y agoJust to be clear: do you want to read more or less texts where it is ok to call people bitches and hoes?
- tantalor 9y agoWhy? Is it making you uncomfortable?
- ominous 9y agoNo. And as for my question "do you want more of it"? While we are at it, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alive:_The_Story_of_the_Andes_Survivors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alive:_The_Story_of_the_Andes_... should we advocate for restaurants that cater to people who had to resort to cannibalism to survive extreme situations? Or is cannibalism something you want less of, not more?
- newsbinator 9y agoHe writes this way because he wants to, not because he has to: > "I also tend not to use a bunch of euphemisms nor do I believe in making concessions so that everyone feels nice and comfy even when we don’t agree. I’m very direct and to the point when it comes to technology and I tend to speak in firm absolutes. If this bothers you, then you won’t enjoy your visits here." When an article gets posted on HN that is written in firm absolutes about bitches and hos and how white people are all like this or like that, then it understandably gets pushback. This man is not a child. He is not a helpless product of his upbringing. He's a grown-up who works in the same general industry we all do. I don't have to appreciate his rudeness and arrogance just because he overcame the odds to get to where he is.