4 ms·
If we were designing things from scratch, I'd even want t odisaggregate two career tracks for scientists: The first, theorists, design interesting studies with
by brownbat 9y ago
If we were designing things from scratch, I'd even want t odisaggregate two career tracks for scientists:
The first, theorists, design interesting studies with open ended questions, explain how the study would provide useful scientific results, or theorize about the implications of existing published results.
The second, practitioners, are hired to actually run the studies according to the specifications provided. The practitioners would publish null results of course. Practitioners would also have to acknowledge how many of their results are significant, so it'd be transparent if they were just confirming everything.
A bit like barristers and solicitors in many common law countries, a distinction that isn't strictly necessary for the system to work, but prevents some conflicts of interest.
- vacri 9y agoOne of my favourite comments from a lecturer in my applied science degree: "In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is". We encountered so many times when theory said one thing but it didn't pan out when tried. It's another way of saying "First, take a spherical cow..."
- Tloewald 9y agoYes, and indeed with this system a theorist can look for interesting data out there and publish with attribution, while experimenters can look for interesting failures and home methodology.