3 ms·

Actually no. Why is it so popular? It seems to have fewer features than hipmunk.... Not to knock them, though, it's a hard problem to solve well from an interf

Actually no. Why is it so popular? It seems to have fewer features than hipmunk.... Not to knock them, though, it's a hard problem to solve well from an interface and integrations perspective.

front2back44 9y ago
Lots of people use them. They're very very into AB testing to the point where they have a building at HQ dedicated to user testing. It may not look like much but they know how to drive their consumers to checkout. And another plus is that they offer free cancellation up to around 24 to 48 hours before your booking.
deleted 9y ago
[deleted]
atombender 9y ago
Personally, I reach for Booking.com because they're simply better than most competitors. They have a huge inventory of hotels, and they have a functional, fairly responsive search interface that isn't annoying. The last part is important — there's little in terms of popups, ads, intrusive upsells, flashy UI elements, and so on. It's not the most modern, but it's very well optimized towards finding stuff. For example, the path to seeing photos is very short (Hipmunk also does well here). Since they're very popular, they also have the benefit of having a large repository of reviews, and I find it easier than other sites to glean, from reviews and scores, how good a hotel is compared to others. TripAdvisor comes close, but is too annoying. Hipmunk is okay, but scores lower on usability for me than Booking.com.
- mp01 9y ago
  > TripAdvisor comes close, but is too annoying. Have you tried the new UI?
- joshvm 9y ago
  Depends. The search is good though, easy to filter, upfront prices and information. It's just that I feel like every time I book somewhere, I'm being rushed into finding that one hotel in the whole of <capital city> that might have a spare bed. It's very smart up-selling because it makes you feel like you're really clever for beating the crowd. The whole experience is designed to make you wish you'd booked yesterday, it's extremely pushy. Things like: showing fully booked hotels in results by default, showing me how many people are looking at the booking RIGHT NOW!, popups saying where the last person booked from (that's not a flashy UI element to you?), big bold messages like "Limited supply in Madrid: 3 properties like Happy Hostel are already unavailable on our site! ", "You missed it!" next to rooms that you can't get. As someone else commented, they AB test the crap out of that website because they know that this stuff gets hotels booked like nobody's business. I put up with it because if you ignore that stuff, the information is well laid out, and the prices and experience is otherwise good. Nowadays I check Booking.com and then go straight to the hotel.
- splonk 9y ago
  Note that the Booking.com reviews are also less obviously spammable than TripAdvisor, since you have to actually have to make a booking to review a hotel. TA reviews in general have a lot of sampling bias involved from solicited reviews (or just flat out fake reviews). On the other hand, do note that the Booking.com review scale is skewed - it's seems to actually be a 2.5-10 scale. The median rating is something like 8.1, so keep that in mind if you're using the review scores.
calbear81 9y ago
Why is this a throwaway account? Hipmunk is not an OTA, they are a metasearch site. When you find a price on Hipmunk, it's just a price from one of the OTAs like Expedia or Booking.com. Even when it's branded as a "Hipmunk" price - it's powered in the backend by one of the OTAs (white label).

Actually no. Why is it so popular? It seems to have fewer features than hipmunk.... Not to knock them, though, it's a hard problem to solve well from an interface and integrations perspective.

front2back44 9y ago

Lots of people use them. They're very very into AB testing to the point where they have a building at HQ dedicated to user testing. It may not look like much but they know how to drive their consumers to checkout. And another plus is that they offer free cancellation up to around 24 to 48 hours before your booking.

deleted 9y ago

[deleted]

atombender 9y ago

Personally, I reach for Booking.com because they're simply better than most competitors. They have a huge inventory of hotels, and they have a functional, fairly responsive search interface that isn't annoying. The last part is important — there's little in terms of popups, ads, intrusive upsells, flashy UI elements, and so on. It's not the most modern, but it's very well optimized towards finding stuff. For example, the path to seeing photos is very short (Hipmunk also does well here). Since they're very popular, they also have the benefit of having a large repository of reviews, and I find it easier than other sites to glean, from reviews and scores, how good a hotel is compared to others. TripAdvisor comes close, but is too annoying. Hipmunk is okay, but scores lower on usability for me than Booking.com.

mp01 9y ago
> TripAdvisor comes close, but is too annoying. Have you tried the new UI?
joshvm 9y ago
Depends. The search is good though, easy to filter, upfront prices and information. It's just that I feel like every time I book somewhere, I'm being rushed into finding that one hotel in the whole of <capital city> that might have a spare bed. It's very smart up-selling because it makes you feel like you're really clever for beating the crowd. The whole experience is designed to make you wish you'd booked yesterday, it's extremely pushy. Things like: showing fully booked hotels in results by default, showing me how many people are looking at the booking RIGHT NOW!, popups saying where the last person booked from (that's not a flashy UI element to you?), big bold messages like "Limited supply in Madrid: 3 properties like Happy Hostel are already unavailable on our site! ", "You missed it!" next to rooms that you can't get. As someone else commented, they AB test the crap out of that website because they know that this stuff gets hotels booked like nobody's business. I put up with it because if you ignore that stuff, the information is well laid out, and the prices and experience is otherwise good. Nowadays I check Booking.com and then go straight to the hotel.
splonk 9y ago
Note that the Booking.com reviews are also less obviously spammable than TripAdvisor, since you have to actually have to make a booking to review a hotel. TA reviews in general have a lot of sampling bias involved from solicited reviews (or just flat out fake reviews). On the other hand, do note that the Booking.com review scale is skewed - it's seems to actually be a 2.5-10 scale. The median rating is something like 8.1, so keep that in mind if you're using the review scores.

calbear81 9y ago

Why is this a throwaway account? Hipmunk is not an OTA, they are a metasearch site. When you find a price on Hipmunk, it's just a price from one of the OTAs like Expedia or Booking.com. Even when it's branded as a "Hipmunk" price - it's powered in the backend by one of the OTAs (white label).