It sure reads like you (and nearly all of the subcomment authors) didn't read the article. This has absolutely nothing to do with the accused guy's behavior or

It sure reads like you (and nearly all of the subcomment authors) didn't read the article. This has absolutely nothing to do with the accused guy's behavior or about any woman whatsoever. It's a case of anonymous internet slander by a male against another male. What does a guy pretending to be a random woman have to do with "using sex to their advantage"? I repeat: you didn't read the article.