4 ms·

I don't see a compelling reason to enable this. Opus is superior in every way.

• masklinn 9y ago
  > I don't see a compelling reason to enable this. Clients support.
  • anc84 9y ago
    WebRTC uses Opus. I don't think a web browser that does not support WebRTC is worth caring about.
    • masklinn 9y ago
      WebRTC requires Opus support for WebRTC. That does not mean arbitrary containers with an Opus stream inside is supported. For instance Lollipop supports Opus in a Matroska container, iOS11 supports Opus in a CAF container, ...
      • anc84 9y ago
        So? Even Microsoft Edge supports Opus in webm.
        • masklinn 9y ago
          1. LAV filters do that, if you can't install LAV filters (Windows 10S?), it won't work 2. and as expected you're now tearing the lawn running with the goalposts, supporting opus and supporting opus in webm are — as I just told you — very different requirements
          • anc84 9y ago
            https://blogs.windows.com/msedgedev/2016/04/18/webm-vp9-and-opus-support-in-microsoft-edge/ https://blogs.windows.com/msedgedev/2016/04/18/webm-vp9-and-... edit: I won't continue arguing since you keep editing your posts.
• mrob 9y ago
  Some audio only exists as mp3. Transcoding to Opus will decrease quality.