4 ms·
110/111 testing positive for CTE is insanely high, even with selection bias. This is a big, big deal, and should be treated like a big, big deal. This is not
by warcher 9y ago
110/111 testing positive for CTE is insanely high, even with selection bias. This is a big, big deal, and should be treated like a big, big deal. This is not hyperbolic in the slightest. If a chemical plant was suspected of causing cancer, and you got those test results, same experimental bias and all, it would be shut down instantly.
Boyoga!
- BayesStreet 9y agoIf I picked a sample of 5 cherries and I made sure they were all rotten, it sort of reduces the amount of statistical inference you can do about the true distribution of the cherries to zero. Your use of "even with selection bias" doesn't really make sense here.
- kilotaras 9y agoIf you picked 9% of all cherries in whatever way you like, and found 98% of them rotten it still means that at least 8.8% of cherries are rotten. While not even close to 98% it's still a huge number in regard to CTE.
- warcher 9y agoTo say nothing of the many potential causes for potential cognitive decline in later life. I would expect the vast majority of cases of dementia in life to not include CTE. Except for NFL players. I'm honestly puzzled at the people coming out of the woodwork to troll this post. What is driving these people and their abandonment of reason?