4 ms·
I refuse to believe that this was at all necessary with all of the enterprise chat applications out there. Uber is big but is in no way an anomalous case.
by ardyjay 9y ago
I refuse to believe that this was at all necessary with all of the enterprise chat applications out there. Uber is big but is in no way an anomalous case.
- sushisource 9y agoYeah, this excerpt is hilarious: "...our team transitioned the company to a new solution capable of reliably delivering over one million messages per day to tens of thousands of users, all in one unified chat environment." Yep, totally no other chat apps capable of those incredibly high numbers /eyeroll
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- wy90021 9y agoenterprise chat products are expensive and don't fit at uber scale
- brenschluss 9y agoUnless data privacy is an issue; if you started your company with questionable means, keeping your data and internal comms completely private could be a (paranoid) priority.
- lojack 9y agoSo, an on premise enterprise chat? Something like HipChat maybe? Less sarcastically, I don't actually think Mattermost was a bad choice. Sure, it sounds like they overengineered the crap out of it, the it sounds like it was fundamentally solid.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]