Maybe. Another poster brought up the impact that having a lot of private land conditionally open to the public could reduce demand for actual public land, whic

Maybe. Another poster brought up the impact that having a lot of private land conditionally open to the public could reduce demand for actual public land, which leads to less places where certain behaviors (those that are allowed on public land but which are banned on the private land) can occur. Imagine someone who built a bunch of private parks all over a city that were open to the public, to the extent there was no demand for any public parks, but who decides to add a clause that no group activities related to sexual orientation (parades, protests, rallies, etc.) were allowed (of any orientation, so there was no discrimination issues). Though, perhaps the blame still lies on the whole city for not keeping their public parks.